This study guide considers how artists attempt to bring into sight the unjust social, political, and economic systems and histories that structure the criminal justice system in the U.S. The guide begins with a brief definition of the term prison industrial complex. It then considers how artists connect the history of slavery and the economic legacies of that system to the prison industrial complex, suggesting that prisons are part of the unfinished project of freedom in the nation. Relevant short clips from the artist interviews are included with each section, and the embedded links will take you to more information about the artworks and artists mentioned.
What do you already know about the Prison Industrial Complex? Before we define it, take a moment to think about what it may encompass.
"The prison has become a black hole into which the detritus of contemporary capitalism is deposited." Angela Davis
Since 1980, the number of people in U.S. prisons has increased more than 500%, despite a crime rate that has been falling steadily for decades. This immense increase in people incarcerated has been the result of changes in law and policy, not changes in crime rates. In fact, there is a profound disconnect between crime and incarceration in the nation, which has been made clear in countless studies and with overwhelming evidence that large-scale incarceration is not an effective means of achieving public safety.
If the numbers of people in prisons have little relation to crime rates, and if incarceration has proven ineffective in public safety in the U.S., why are there so many prisons and so many people inside of them?
For much of these study guides we refer to “prisons” or “the prison system,” but to answer the question of why we have prisons if they are not a solution for crime, it is important to remember that the prison system is more far-reaching than the prison structures themselves. The Prison Industrial Complex (PIC) is a term that since the 1990s has been used to describe the complex and overlapping interests of government and industry that use surveillance, policing, detention, and imprisonment as solutions to economic, social and political problems.
Thinking in terms of the PIC allows us to address the economic, political, and ideological structures that support the U.S. prison system. The PIC encompasses all aspects of the criminal justice system including laws and legislature, police officers, prison employees, judges, and courts, and it also includes the corporations that profit from prison building and prison labor, and the manufacturers of equipment used by guards and police. The PIC additionally consists of the political power derived from issues of prisons and policing, with policies, positions, and legislation around crime and punishment profoundly influencing voting and fundamentally driving politics in the United States. As Ruth Gilmore explains this complex point, prisons and crime are strategically used by politicians and governments “to legitimize the state.”
In other words, and as the term prison industrial complex suggests, prisons, policing, and the entire criminal justice system are central to the social, economic, and political structures of the U.S., despite failing to address the issues of public safety and crime that are their ostensible purpose. As Angela Davis puts it, the prison industrial complex “generate[s] huge profits from processes of social destruction.” The profits she is referring to surpass the financial.
How did this definition of the prison industrial complex differ from or align with your expectations? Where can you see the PIC in your own community or in recent U.S. politics?
“How does visual art help to reveal the depth of devastation caused by our nation’s punishment system?” Nicole Fleetwood
“The 3,000 women in my prison are disproportionately poor and minority. Prison marks a separation in our society between the “haves” and the “have-nots,” between those who walk free and those of us held captive. Beverly Henry
Activist Mariame Kaba describes the violent and destructive history of prison and policing in the U.S. as connected to the history of slavery:
“There is not a single era in United States history in which the police were not a force of violence against Black people. Policing in the South emerged from the slave patrols in the 1700 and 1800s that caught and returned runaway slaves. In the North, the first municipal police departments in the mid-1800s helped quash labor strikes and riots against the rich. Everywhere, they have suppressed marginalized populations to protect the status quo.”
The prison industrial complex emerged, to summarize this brief historical overview, to enforce racist social hierarchies and unequal economic structures.
Nowhere are the connections between the nation’s part of slavery and the present prison industrial complex made more explicitly than in documentary photographer’s Chandra McCormick and Keith Calhoun’s ongoing series "Slavery: The Prison Industrial Complex".
This series of photographs was taken over four decades in the Louisiana State Penitentiary, which is called Angola after the former plantation on which the prison is located. The plantation was named for the country of origin of the majority of the people enslaved there. McCormick and Calhoun’s images capture how Angola reveals slavery’s afterlife. The photographs show the men incarcerated in the prison, 82% of whom are African American, working the 18,000 acres of Angola in conditions that seem little changed in the 150 years since slavery was abolished in the United States. The unfree men who continue to work the field of this plantation turned prison under the watchful gaze of armed white men who tower over them on horseback are paid as little as as two cents and no more than one dollar an hour for their hard labor.
The black and white photographs seem to give viewers a glimpse into the nation’s troubled history, not of what is unfolding in the present. Calhoun and McCormick stress that viewers struggle to believe that their photos of workers are happening in the present moment. Calhoun states:
“They say, ‘That was a long time ago, huh?’ And I say ‘No, it goes on every morning. Every morning they got a line running in the fields somewhere. In Angola, it's mandatory that you work, so every morning you gotta get up behind that horse.’ Slavery is not over.”
Sharon Daniel’s artworks center the voices of incarcerated individuals describing their experiences of injustice and the economic oppression of the PIC. Her series Undoing Time was inspired by an op-ed written by Beverly Henry, a woman formerly incarcerated at CCWF, who worked sewing U.S. flags in a prison factory. The op-ed speaks to the failure of the U.S. government to offer liberty and justice to all. Daniel explains that after reading the op-ed, she wanted “to see it embroidered into the stripes of every flag that came out of that factory.” In response, Daniel’s sculptures use these flags manufactured within the California prison system, stitching into them various testaments to the system’s unjust workings.
Daniel’s newest work EXPOSED is a website which documents the spread of COVID-19 inside prisons, jails, and detention centers across the US. The harrowing artwork calls attention to the way that our society treats those incarcerated as disposable. During the pandemic, though visitation and education programs within prisons have been halted, the factory labor continues. A recent Los Angeles Times article reported on the mask and hand sanitizer production in a California prison. Robbie Hall, an incarcerated woman who worked in the factory and contracted COVID-19, described the operation as being “like a slave factory. The more you give them, the more they want.” Explore the work here.
If prison labor has a clear relation to slavery, comparing the PIC to slavery does little to account for the fact that less than half of America’s prison population works. In the most recent available statistics, only 800,000 people incarcerated, out of a population of about 2.3 million, had jobs within their facilities. The majority remain locked in cells and dorm rooms without occupation, costing governments vast amounts of money.
The Redaction Project, a collaboration between visual artist Titus Kaphar and poet and attorney Reginald Dwayne Betts, offers insights to how racism, economics, and the PIC are linked in ways that do not look like slave labor.
For these prints, the collaborators transform court documents into haunting portraits. Each work combines a delicate line etching with words extracted from lawsuits filed by the Civil Rights Corps on behalf of people incarcerated because they lacked the means to pay their court fees. As Michelle Alexander states: “Most Americans probably have no idea how common it is for people to be convicted without ever having the benefit of legal representation.” In Kaphar and Bett’s prints, this unjust reality is poetically unmasked by redacting the superfluous text from the court documents to leave just the most salient and tragic details. In Untitled (Alabama 6.1) the fragments of text reveal a father who was jailed for 23 days over a traffic ticket and fines of $1600, was ordered to clean blood and feces from the jail floor while detained, and then lost his job while jailed. In Untitled (Missouri 3), the text ends “threatened, abused/ left to languish/ family members could/ buy their freedom.” The works bear witness to the criminalization of poverty and the ongoing reality that freedom is a question of financial means. The fact that the victims of this injustice that Kaphar and Bett’s work portray are all African American also depicts how racism is used to justify this twisted economics.
How do you feel after looking at these different artworks? Did any of them reveal something new about the prison system to you?
“I think of the flag as a kind of mask and a veil. It screens out the view of the real history of our country in terms of its origins in genocide and slavery.” Sharon Daniel
“We’re never actually going to build anything until we contend with the faulty premise on which this nation was founded.” Sonya Clark
Freedom in the United States has always been defined in relationship to forms of racialized unfreedom. Whether looking at chattel slavery, the genocide and resettlement of Native Americans, the internment of Japanese Americans, segregation and red lining, or the current crises of mass incarceration and detention, the vision of full and free citizenship has been crafted in contrast to a designated other. These exclusions are foundational to the nation and thus to the ways that freedom and democracy have been practiced and built. Artists in Barring Freedom look at the tensions between U.S. claims to liberty and justice and the actually existing practices. In doing so, they also open the possibilities for envisioning freedom anew.
Before you move on, take a moment to define freedom for yourself. How do you know if you are free or not? How are your freedoms intertwined or in tension with the freedoms of others?
Barring Freedom includes several artworks by Sonya Clark which all consider the ongoing promise and failure of democracy and equality for all in the United States. In the interview segment below, Clark discusses her sculptures Edifice and Mortar and Three-Fifths, both of which draw attention to the continual striving towards democracy and equality and the unfinished nature of emancipation. She says:
"Every day, all day, as America tries to work its way towards democracy, it has to contend and redress the issues of racial disparity, racism, racial injustice, and racial inequality and every time it doesn't the democracy falters. And we haven't gotten there yet."
In her extended interview, Clark discusses how the materials she uses, particularly human hair, carry complex and dense histories into her works.
Dread Scott powerfully argues that it is a privilege to think that slavery is over in his screen print #WhileWhite. The piece uses the repeating hashtag in reference to the ways that images and activism circulate online, but here the hashtags refer to privileges that have been granted to white people. Some of them are privileges that may be taken for granted, such as being presumed innocent in a court of law, or which may be uncomfortable to see in oneself, such as avoiding blame or getting a job you are unqualified for. Others reference particular acts of violence against Black individuals perpetrated by white individuals in the United States. Taken together, the list offers a mirror to what freedom looks like in a white supremacist culture: thinking only of yourself and treating the lives of others as disposable. In the context of COVID-19, the prevalence of this mentality is hard to ignore.
To find other visions of freedom, Dread Scott turns to history. In the video below, he discusses his Slave Revolt Reenactment as an opportunity to learn from the enslaved. Scott argues that the writings on freedom by men such as Washington and Jefferson who owned slaves are limited by their oppression of others while, in contrast, the enslaved held the more radical and expansive vision of freedom: “A project like Slave Rebellion Reenactment actually is calling on people to learn from people who fought to overthrow a system of enslavement.”
Dread Scott upends U.S. history by suggesting that our heroes shouldn’t be George Washington and Thomas Jefferson but the many enslaved people who tried to revolt and overturn the system. In your opinion, who are the visionaries of freedom in our current moment?